Tuesday, September 20, 2016

The Feud of the Tuthmosids and the mutilation of Hatshepsut's reliefs in Hatshepsut's Temple .. Part ( 2 )

The buildings at the temple show signs of the dynastic troubles of the time . In the main, the building is Hatshepsut's ; but the names of her father Tuthmosis I,
and her brother and husband, Tuthmosis II, also appear, while her other half-brother and possible husband, Tuthmosis III is represented in addition, though in a very subordinate position .



Then it becomes evident that Tuthmosis III, on finally succeeding to the throne after the queen's death, wreaked upon her work here, as elsewhere, his vengeance for the subjection to which he had been reduced during the reign of his masterful relative, and hacked out, so far as possible, her figure and her cartouches from the reliefs .



Farther than this there is no need for us to go in the complicated problem of " The Feud of the Tuthmosids ", as it has been called . Nor was this the end of the mutilations which Hatshepsut's beautiful sculptures were destined to endure .



When Akhenaten's religious frenzy against Amûn was at its height, El-Deir El-Bahari did not escape the visit of his agents, who carefully destroyed the figure of the hated god, and all references to him . Ramses II later restored the wrecked reliefs, but, as might be anticipated, with much inferior work .

Hatshepsut's reliefs, therefore, have suffered double mutilation, from family hatreds, and from religious prejudices ; they still remain, however, among the finest extant specimens of 18th Dynasty work .



After its strenuous youth, the temple had a long period of peace, which was scarcely disturbed by the restoration work of Ramses II, and the intrusion of Meneptah's cartouche . Interest was revived in Ptolemaic times, with results which could very well have been done without . The innermost shrine, at the extreme west end of the temple, was then entirely rebuilt, and the worship of two deified human beings, Imhôtep, the architect of the Step Pyramid, and Amenhotpe, son of Hapu, the architect of King Amenhotep III, was intruded in a place which had no connexion with either .

Nor does the quality of the Ptolemaic reliefs in any way compensate for their incongruity with the position in which they find themselves . They are clumsy and ill-proportioned, and serve only to underline the decay of Egyptian art . It has been possible, fortunately, to remove most of the impertinent Christian additions to Queen Hatshepsut's great building ; but the barbarous wreckage wrought by the fanatics of early Christian times cannot so easily be made good . A certain amount of restoration has been found necessary in modern times to preserve the precious reliefs from weather .





Part ( 3 ) .. Coming SoOoOon .....
Uploading .....

No comments:

Post a Comment